What is a Common Heel?

Some reenactment specifications suggest a “common heel” for stockings. What do we mean by this?

A common heel has a heel flap, and usually a gusset. The gusset shows above your shoes, so it’s a visible feature. If you look at your 21st century socks, you’ll see a diagonal line in the knit at the heel. This is a short row heel, and is the type of heel that modern circular knitting machines can do easily.

Modern stockings are knitted in the round, with the same size tube for the leg and the foot. An early patent for the circular knitter was in 1798, but a practical production machine was not patented until 1816.
Stocking from the General Carleton of Whitby, an English ship which sank in 1785. Object belongs to Poland’s National Maritime Museum, in Gdansk (CCM) http://www.cmm.pl/

This stocking has a “shaped common heel.” It’s called “shaped” because the back of the heel has a curve. Regular common heels are squared off at the center back instead of shaped.
Another version is called a “Balbriggan heel,” and has shaping at about the ¼ and ¾ mark of the heel flap as well as the center back halfway mark.
These heel terms come from the book Folk Socks by Nancy Bush.

Above is another stocking from the General Carleton, and this one has a Dutch heel. Instead of simply being folded, it has a band of knitting that continues under the heel. ‪It has the side gussets, too. I’m still trying to find the earliest date for a Dutch heel to see if exists by the Rev War era, but the common, shaped common, and Balbriggan heels can be found for that part of the century.

Something to avoid is a slip stitch heel flap, a later technique to make a sturdier heel. It gives a slightly ribbed appearance, and part of it will show above a shoe. It’s popular with modern sock knitters, so if you commission someone to knit a pair of 18th century stockings make sure they don’t do that. For reinforcement, run in the heels instead.

‪There are a few extant 18thC stockings that do not have a gusset. A stocking which is dated as 1750 (in the DeWitt Wallace museum at Colonial Williamsburg) has decorative clocking, but the structure itself has no gore.
With a similar design and also without a gore is this silk stocking, dated to 1700, which was in the Museum Of Costume & Textiles in Nottingham, England.

Gores allow for a better fit, but were likely skipped in some stockings so they would not interfere with the design. Some stockings are made with a taller gore. Ankle high gores are sufficient for fit, so taller gores also become a design element.

This blobby foot, from the General Carleton, has a short gusset that is not well defined.

This fragment, also in the National Maritime Museum in Poland, is from a Fresian ship that sank in 1791. It would have had no gusset, and the ridge makes it a little bit different from a short row heel. Oops, hey, that’s not supposed to exist in the 18th century! But there it is.

While they’re not all called “common heel,” a gusseted stocking is most likely what you will find in the 18th century. There are variations, so it’s just a matter of having an example that works with the rest of the outfit.

© Carol Kocian and StockingFrameOfMind, 2020. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Carol Kocian and StockingFrameOfMind with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

5 Replies to “What is a Common Heel?”

  1. I am amazed by your research. I find period stockings interesting and have been trying to think of ways to reproduce the look. I have considered using a modern knitting board but I haven’t found one that can make stitches that are fine enough. Now I think I understand the issue. I am very envious of your stocking frame. Well done!

    1. Hi Lori, thank you! Some of the knitting frames (machines) of the time could knit very fine, and denser than what we use today. I continue to hope we can adapt the modern machinery, without breaking it!

  2. Hi!
    I love your site! I was just about to give up on finding good resources for machine knit 18th century stockings when I found it. Would you have a few answers to a lost reenactment Swede trying to make sense of this?

    I am currently working on a full uniform for a British private ca. 1776 and stockings are next up. I intend to use a modern knitting machine and am now trying to work out the pattern and method. I am struggling with understanding how the part from the gusset and forward is made as I cannot find any side seams or any seam across the sole.
    Could it be made from the top and down, then splitting into the middle upper part and the two back pieces, then to the front where it doubles back down and ties back into the upper. Then widens to create the gussets and then ends when it meets the heel parts?

    Any help with this would be fantastic!

    1. Hi Carl, thank you for your note! You’re close to the right idea for the way stockings were constructed on frames. I’m planning to write a post of the steps involved and the shapes as they were knit.
      A difference with modern knitting machines is that they make a stretchier knit. 18th century stockings were denser and not as stretchy as what we use today. You can get closer by fulling your stockings after you knit them. You’ll need to experiment with the size since fulling will shrink them. I hope to hear more about your progress!

      1. Other things have come in the way so the stocking project has stood still for a while. So I regret to say that I don’t have any progress to share just yet.
        Again and again I get impressed with the 18th century(and earlier) mechanics that could compete with the denseness of todays machines (perhaps denseness is not as prioritized nowadays though). I hesitate to start on the actual stockings without understanding the pattern principal so I have not been able to continue since I haven’t found any more leads.
        So a post on that would be amazing!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.